Predictive Maintenance: Data Requirements & Labeling Checklist (Pilot Planner)
Interactive checklist and pilot planner to ensure PM pilots collect sufficient, consistently labeled, and high-quality data for model training, validation, and evaluation. Includes a short labeling-convention template, a minimal dataset schema example, and structured fields to record readiness, metrics, and next steps.
Predictive Maintenance Data & Labeling Checklist
Use this interactive checklist to scope predictive maintenance pilots, capture labeling conventions, and record the minimum dataset, data-quality checks, and pilot evaluation metrics needed to produce repeatable, defensible results. Complete the fields as you plan the pilot; saved responses can be used to compare multiple pilots or handed to data engineers and labeling teams.
Why this matters
Clear failure definitions, balanced labeled examples, synchronized timestamps, and an explicit minimal schema are the difference between a useful pilot and one that can't be evaluated or scaled. This planner helps teams avoid common pitfalls—insufficient negatives, label ambiguity, unlabeled baseline modes, and undocumented sampling rates.
Quick Labeling Convention Template
Labeling document should include: - Failure class name(s) and short description(s) - Precise start and end criteria (timestamp rules) - Label granularity (event-level, cycle-level, per-sample) - Negative-class rules (what counts as non-failure) - Edge-case rules and examples - Labeler qualification and review process - Inter-annotator agreement target and adjudication method
Sample minimal dataset schema (example)
timestamp (ISO 8601) machine_id sensor_id sensor_type value unit operating_mode label labeler_id label_timestamp
Adapt names to your environment but keep a consistent schema across sensors and systems.
Save a personal copy, bring it to your team, or tailor the questions and workflow to fit what you are hungry to improve.
Discussion
Comments and conversation will live here.